<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Reformed Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonomist.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Psalm 119:160 The entirety of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='theonomist.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://theonomist.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="The Reformed Standard" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Theonomy is Reformed &#8211; 17th Century Quotes</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/theonomy-is-reformed-17th-century-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/theonomy-is-reformed-17th-century-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theonomist.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/theonomy-is-reformed-17th-century-quotes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quotations from the 17th Century Reformers Now we arrive at the century that gave us the Westminster Standards. Today there is much confusion as to what the writers meant by &#34;general equity&#34; in chapter 19, paragraph 4 of the confession. After reading the quotes from the 16th century as well as quotes from the 17th, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=94&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/theonomy-is-reformed-17th-century-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theonomy is Reformed &#8211; 16th Century Quotes</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/theonomy-is-reformed-16th-century-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/theonomy-is-reformed-16th-century-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Favorites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/theonomy-is-reformed-16th-century-quotes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quotations from the Early Reformers I am providing the quotes here with very little comment. Take note especially of the tems &#8220;equity, equitable, and judicial.&#8221; These are terms used in the Westminster Confession and without a proper understanding of their contemporary use, we tend to interpret the confession importing our modern usage of such terms. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=92&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/theonomy-is-reformed-16th-century-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theonomy is Reformed – Friendly Opponents</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/theonomy-is-reformed-%e2%80%93-friendly-opponents/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/theonomy-is-reformed-%e2%80%93-friendly-opponents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/theonomy-is-reformed-%e2%80%93-friendly-opponents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction Not all those who don’t embrace Theonomy would assert that that it isn’t reformed. To follow I give you two examples. Dr. Meredith Kline Dr. Meredith Kline (Clarks beloved professor) in his critique of Dr. Bahnsen’s book “Theonomy in Christian Ethics,” wrote: “At the same time it must be said that Chalcedon is not [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=89&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/theonomy-is-reformed-%e2%80%93-friendly-opponents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theonomy is Reformed &#8211; The Current Problem</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/theonomy-is-reformed-the-current-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/theonomy-is-reformed-the-current-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/theonomy-is-reformed-the-current-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE PROBLEM TODAY I believe that the evidence supporting my thesis is so overwhelming that anyone arguing against it should be embarrassed, especially if one is a theological historian. However, we have had many such attempts from the last three decades that it is necessary to address this topic. Even though the notion that Theonomy [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=85&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/theonomy-is-reformed-the-current-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theonomy is &#8220;Reformed&#8221; &#8211; Introduction</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/theonomy-is-reformed-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/theonomy-is-reformed-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/theonomy-is-reformed-introduction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years ago, I posted an essay regarding the question of whether reformers of old held &#34;theonomic&#34; views or not. I referred to the assertion that there is a difference between &#34;Theocrats&#34; and &#34;Theonomists,&#34; that the reformers were the former but not the latter, and theonomy is a novelty. I also said I&#8217;d study it [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=81&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/theonomy-is-reformed-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heresies of Meredith Kline</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/the-heresies-of-meredith-kline/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/the-heresies-of-meredith-kline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Favorites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reformed Covenanter has a post about Kline here: http://reformedcovenanter.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/the-heresies-of-meredith-kline/ Interesting. Can anybody with first-hand knowledge of Kline confirm these quotes and speak to whether or not they are in context?<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=78&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/the-heresies-of-meredith-kline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bahnsen vs. Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/bahnsen-vs-shepherd/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/bahnsen-vs-shepherd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahnsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. R. Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[EDIT] Be sure to see my additions at the bottom, with some clarification/corrections&#8230; Dr. Clark has a post here that speaks of theonomy and the fv being separated at birth. The discussion goes on for a bit and part of it calls into question the legitimacy of bring Dr. Bahnsen into the mix. It is [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=71&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/bahnsen-vs-shepherd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.cmfnow.com/Download/gb1432.mp3" length="20955820" type="audio/mpeg" />
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About Me Updated</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/about-me-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/about-me-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Favorites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just updated my &#8216;About Me&#8217; page. Click on it above if you&#8217;re interested.   Kazoo<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=66&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/about-me-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Written by the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/article-written-by-the-christian-anti-defamation-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/article-written-by-the-christian-anti-defamation-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Favorites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/article-written-by-the-christian-anti-defamation-commission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found it a wonderful work of Providence that shortly after I posted on &#8220;Salt and Light,&#8221; I received an e-mail from the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission speaking to the same subject. I asked for, and received permission to re-print this article since it is relevant to the latest discussion I started on this blog. I [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=50&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/article-written-by-the-christian-anti-defamation-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.christianadc.org/uploads/LOGOTITLELARGE.JPG" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.christianadc.org/uploads/LOGOMAIN.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Pass the Salt if You Can See it</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/please-pass-the-salt-if-you-can-see-it/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/please-pass-the-salt-if-you-can-see-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2 Kingdoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt and Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon on the Mount]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/please-pass-the-salt-if-you-can-see-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week or two the question of a Christian&#8217;s involvement in politics has come up once or twice. For example, Dr. Clark wrote an article (found here) in support of the California Proposition 8, which added just a few words to our State&#8217;s constitution: &#8220;Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=47&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/please-pass-the-salt-if-you-can-see-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Self Fulfilling Prophecy of the Amillenial 2 Kingdom Camp</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/the-self-fulfilling-prophecy-of-the-amillenial-2-kingdom-camp/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/the-self-fulfilling-prophecy-of-the-amillenial-2-kingdom-camp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2 Kingdoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eschatology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amillennialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postmillennialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prophecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a well written article regarding the efforts of a few San Diego pastors: http://www.worldmag.com/articles/article.cfm?eid=7EF87E24-A0B5-BDF2-2E3D2AA862332998 Excerpt: The 14th Amendment equal-protection argument in favor of gay marriage already is trampling First Amendment rights to religious exercise and free speech. In March 2006, for example, the 103-year-old adoption division of Boston Catholic Charities (BCC) decided to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=43&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/the-self-fulfilling-prophecy-of-the-amillenial-2-kingdom-camp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Were 17th Century Puritans Theocrats or Theonomists?</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/were-17th-century-puritans-theocrats-or-theonomists/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/were-17th-century-puritans-theocrats-or-theonomists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Favorites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize that it is anachronistic to ask a question such as this. But lately I&#8217;ve encountered the argument that there is a difference between the reformers (called Theocrats) and modern day Theonomists. Every time I read some of the earlier primary sources, I find myself wondering what differs in their view that makes them [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=38&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/were-17th-century-puritans-theocrats-or-theonomists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Sinai a Republication of the Covenant of Works?</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/was-sinai-a-republication-of-the-covenant-of-works/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/was-sinai-a-republication-of-the-covenant-of-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching for electronic copies of primary sources WRT the Westminster Divines, I came across this blog. Casey Bessette gives five reasons he disagrees with Dr. Clark from the Heidelblog where we find an article asserting that the Westminster Confession did in fact support the idea that God republished the CoW at Sinai. This article is linked [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=33&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/was-sinai-a-republication-of-the-covenant-of-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gary North on the Latent Antinomian-Statist Alliance</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/gary-north-on-the-latent-antinomian-statist-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/gary-north-on-the-latent-antinomian-statist-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m cooking something up myself, but for now I want to point you to the following short post: Gary North on the Latent Antinomian-Statist Alliance<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=31&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/gary-north-on-the-latent-antinomian-statist-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Current American Presbyterian Confession</title>
		<link>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/the-current-american-presbyterian-confession/</link>
		<comments>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/the-current-american-presbyterian-confession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kazooless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonomist.wordpress.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post I pointed out how the American Presby&#8217;s undermined themselves by changing the confession in the very part that is what gave them their confession. They pulled the rug out from under their own feet! Next, I want to address our modern &#8220;reformed&#8221; brethren from the W2K camp and very simply and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theonomist.wordpress.com&amp;blog=278389&amp;post=30&amp;subd=theonomist&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theonomist.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/the-current-american-presbyterian-confession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fdb551259f6e704073263a6d96c7f2e9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kazooless</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
